Once a PAO has been granted, the benefiting spouse or partner may have the option to transfer their share of the pension into a separate arrangement in their own name. This can provide greater flexibility and control, particularly where there are advantages in terms of investment choice, fees, performance, or access.
There are two main approaches used to divide pension benefits:
By way of illustration, if the court awards a 50% relevant percentage, the non-member would be entitled to half of the pension benefits accrued during the relevant period.
Earmarking involves directing that a portion of the pension benefits will be paid to the former spouse or civil partner when the pension holder eventually retires. No separate pension fund is created for the non-member, and payments remain dependent on the member’s retirement decisions and the rules of the scheme.
Pension splitting takes a different approach by dividing the pension fund at the point of separation or divorce. A specified percentage of the pension is transferred into an independent fund for the non-member, who then holds and manages that pension separately, subject to scheme rules.
This option is often preferred as it provides greater independence and certainty. The non-member is no longer reliant on the pension holder’s retirement timing or choices, allowing both parties to move forward with a clear and separate financial position.
While every situation must be assessed on its own merits, pension splitting is frequently chosen because it offers a clean and independent outcome for both parties.